The Blue MVP
The MVP Award is always a big deal in baseball. But while Bud Selig feels the need to keep fans in captive suspense, Blue Notes isn't waiting around to hand out its own big kahuna hardware: the Blue MVP. The cat in a Dodger uni best adept at putting whatever needed happening into motion. The one guy they could have lived least without this season.
To clarify, I'm only talking regular season, not the playoffs. Why? To begin, that's how the actual MVP voting works, so I'm apeing the gold standard. Plus, the entire playoffs amounted to three games, so it's not a whole lot to go on. And to be blunt, just about nobody showed up (at least nobody I consider a legit MVP candidate), so it's a moot point, anyway. Any way you slice it, I should be judging off those 162 games. Even if the playoffs are baseball's bread and butter, without the regular season, you ain't arriving at the supermarket to purchase those sandwich items.
Back in May and June, it seemed like the obvious and only choice would be Nomar Garciaparra. Aside from making a seamless switch from shortstop to first base, hitting .373 and accounting for 39 RBIs, his local roots were the cake's icing for rabid Angelenos. But a second-half slump and a string of injuries transformed him from "front runner" to "another guy in the race."
April through early July gave Brad Penny a leg up, since it's hard to picture an All-Star Game starter not weighing heavily into the mix. Then came late July through September, where Penny's outings appeared to be the Devil's work (6-7, 6.25 ERA, 6 innings often his limit). Whether or not Satan was actually the culprit, Penny fell out of contention.
Despite some grumbling within the blogging nation, J.D. Drew's season hardly sucked. He came on strong down the stretch, played in 146 games (the most ever in his career, proving a certain method to Grady Little's rest-heavy madness) and drove in 100 RBIs. However, if anyone griped that those ribbies felt like a really quiet — and often unenthusiastic — century mark achievement, I'd have a hard time arguing.
And so on and so forth. Guys often got on rolls, often to get derailed. Others were solid, but just missed the mark in my opinion (and perhaps mine only). There are players some will find worthier than others, but these are my top five choices. Do with them what you will.
Honorable Mention - Andre Ethier
The newbie would have absolutely cracked the top five (and perhaps won Rookie of the Year) had a vicious September slump not have happened. Being held out of the lineup down the stretch was major points against. But pencil him in for a 1-5 slot many times over in the near future.
Honorable Mention - Greg Maddux
The guy's presence alone almost pushed him into the magic five. Without his arrival (and calming influence), I don't think the Dodgers would have made the playoffs. And "sage factor" aside, his pitching wasn't too shoddy, either. But I couldn't bring myself to "place" a guy who didn't arrive until mid-August, after too much heavy lifting/ups and downs had already happened. But Maddux definitely made his mark.
5th - Russell Martin
Somehow, Martin made the rather daunting task of being an everyday rookie catcher look...well, easy. Everyone waited for him to hit the rookie wall. A few exhausted September games aside, that never really happened. In the meantime, he garnered instant respect from every vet pitcher on the staff. He's among the most mature young athletes I've been around and seems like a perrential All-Star in the making.
4th - Nomar Garciaparra
Like I said, Nomar's second half didn't match his first, which kept him from netting the gold. But it also featured some seriously huge plays. Walk off extra-innings home run. Walk off granny. Clutch base hits. And it just doesn't seem right to leave the NL Comeback Player of the Year off the list. So I didn't.
3rd - Takashi Saito
This isn't a diss on Bill Mueller, but I doubt most people thought it would be more difficult replacing him than Eric Gagne. And I guarantee nobody thought the reason would be a 36-year-old nonroster invitee rookie from Japan. Sammy's 24 saves (breaking Yhency Brazoban's Dodger rookie record) were impressive enough. But considering Danys Baez started out as the closer and that mega-losing streak allowed Saito only six appearances out of a possible 14, it's safe to say he was capable of racking 30+. It's scary to imagine how this team would have handled slim leads without him. And you gotta love the fist pump.
2nd - Derek Lowe
As the season wore down, expecting six quality innings from a starter was a dicey, crapshoot, Russian roulette affair, an especially troublesome development considering middle relief wasn't even that reliable. Derek Lowe was the one exception, however, with his best stuff coming in August and September. In 11 starts, Lowe went 7-1. More impressively, he picked up another "W" tossing a trio of clutch relief innings. Lowe may have began 2006 as the No. 2 starter. Care to bet he won't open 2007 as the No. 1?
1st - Rafael Furcal
I gotta be honest. Early on, there was no way in hell I thought Furcal would take the gold. And with good reason. Having arrived in L.A. batting .157 at the Ravine during his career, a .198 April didn't feel like just a "slow start." Even more ominous, his bat wasn't nearly as bad as his mitt, the faultiness of which was putting him on pace for roughly a billion errors. Ned Colletti's first big-money free agent signing was looking like a $39,000,000 mistake. In the meantime, people were speculating that the pressure of said contract was freaking Furcal out.
But right around July, something clicked. Whether finally healthy, pushed by the eventual presences of Cesar Izturis and Julio Lugo, or just telling himself, "Raffy, you make a lot of scratch. Get over it," Furcal went on a crazy tear. He never hit below .313 on a month (leading to a final clip of .300, first among leadoff batters with 375 or more at-bats). August and September amounted to 30 RBIs (65 in all, ranking him fourth among those same hitters).
And while he's not quite the next Ozzie Smith, he settled down considerably while minding the gap between second and third, no longer prompting cringes when a ball headed his way: 113 runs scored (10th in NL, 15th in the majors); 37 swiped bases (7 NL, 13 MLB). Even a little home run pop.
I wasn't wrong for being down on the results of Furcal's first 70 or so games. But I was certainly off base doubting whether the guy had what it took to turn it all around.
So there you have it. My Blue MVP. Did I get it right? Or do you take umbrage?
—AK

I think you nailed it! Before I saw your picks, in my head, I said Furcal. And all the others were right on. If there was another HM I would select Lofton. He had some remarkebly CLUTCH at bats during the season. Which is why his absence in the playoffs was so glaring. I think MVP for non uniformed Dodgers goes to Mr. Colletti.
Posted by: F-LoDuca | October 12, 2006 at 09:49 AM
F-LoDuca,
I thought of Lofton as one of the "just missed the mark" guys when it came to "Honorable Mention," but I definitely see why you'd include him. He certainly had a nice season, all in all.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | October 12, 2006 at 09:56 AM
This one is a no-brainer for me. There are only 2 players worth consideration: Nomar and Furcal.
With all due respect to Mad Dog, you can’t make a player who only played 2 months the MVP of your team.
Here’s why it isn’t Nomar:
Despite all of his heroics and all of his clutch hitting, the team’s success did not rest on the shoulders of Nomar. That’s not a knock on the guy, by-the-way. But you never got the sense that Nomar took the team on his shoulders and led them to victory. Great heroics? Yes. Hard worker? Check. Clutch? Of course. But not the most valuable player.
Here’s why it is Furcal:
As far as Furcal went, so went the Dodgers. The guy was the spark plug to our offense. He was fierce on the base pads, fierce in the hitter’s box, and fierce in field despite his errors. When Furcal was playing well the Dodgers were doing well. He played with heart, he played with passion, and with his play he led the Dodgers into battle. Isn’t it a coincidence that we struggled in the playoffs while Furcal struggled at the plate? Again, as far as Furcal went, so did the Dodgers. It's really that simple. THAT makes him the MVP.
Posted by: LoLo | October 12, 2006 at 09:58 AM
Lolo,
Yeah, it's interesting how things can look once you start breaking down the season. For example, I had Saito ranked ahead of Martin for "Blue MVP." And BK is working on a Dodger ROY post, and in terms of the seasons themselves, I might rank Martin ahead of Saito, in that I think you can make an argument that Martin's achievements were more impressive. Or at the very least, more taxing. (And FYI, this gives away no surprises in terms of BK's post. I have no idea who he's selecting. We haven't even discussed it).
But in terms of value to his team this particular season, I'd still put Saito higher. I think the team would have been relatively better off with Navarro still catching (despite not being as good as Martin) and Saito on the hill than Martin catching and whoever else as the closer. Thus, Saito becomes more of the "MVP," even if Martin's season might be more of an achievement.
It's all how you look at things, I guess.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | October 12, 2006 at 10:09 AM
The astonishing thing about Saito's emergence for the Dodgers this season was that his last two years in Yokohama were little short of debacles. He had also been rather homer prone his last three seasons and had injury problems. Saito is one of the suprises of the year in baseball period, on either side of the Pacific.
Posted by: Gary Garland | October 12, 2006 at 10:51 AM
AK,
I am going to throw it out there, and I know a lot of people are going to disagree, but I think the MVP for me was Russel Martin. I know you already made the argument against him but just hear me out.
1) Before he came up, we were not playing well, Dioner Navarro was not looking terrible, but definitely worse than what we thought. We had just lost a million (give or take a game) games to the padres, blew a 5 run lead in the 9th, and all that other stuff. Martin is called up. Things change. We go on a tear that puts us back into the race. Without that I don't think we make the playoffs. He just seems to epitomize the never give up attitude that the Dodgers had this year.
2) As a catcher, we could not hold anybody on base. We were just getting abused on the basepaths. Russel has an arm that lead to throwing out 30% of the runners. Fewer runners going allows the pitchers to focus on the important things like pitching. In addition, he had to manage a very diverse staff. You got the young guys (broxton, Billingsley), your cagey vets (maddux), guys in their prime (Lowe and Penny), foreign transplant/cagey vet/guy in prime/rookie in Saito.
3) he's clutch, remember walkoff homer in the 1-0 win as well as being one of the back-back-back-backers.
4)He looks like Turtle from Entourage
So I think Raffy is a good pick but he was more of a second half MVP, I'm not sure he even. For the season, I think Martin did more. But that's just my opinion.
Posted by: bmurph | October 12, 2006 at 11:04 AM
AK,
Then again, Furcal was my boy all year long. So I am enjoying the fruits of my labor now. HAHA!
Posted by: LoLo | October 12, 2006 at 11:15 AM
I have to go with Martin. His combination of youthful vigor with an almost preternatural ability to channel the kind of calm you'd only expect from a veteran (i.e., his ability to calm any pitcher down - even Bad Penny) make him my top pick.
Posted by: Su-Kim | October 12, 2006 at 11:21 AM
Bmurph and Su-Kim,
As anyone who's been following the blog all season knows, I've been very high on Martin since the minute he's been up. He had a fantastic season, on the field and in the clubhouse. I'd have no problem with anyone who thinks he was the MVP. Solid choice (even if it isn't mine).
And when it came to the rankings, outside of Furcal (who I felt was the #1), the 2-5 order went back and forth in my head. It probably could have shaken out in a lot of combinations.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | October 12, 2006 at 11:33 AM
AK....I'm with you on everyone except Maddux.
He was ok....but I think we all still see him as the dominant pitcher he used to be. He can still dazzle for a couple innings, but his inability to pitch more than 70-80 pitches makes him a liability as a starter. I mean it seems to me you are starting off the game already behind the 8-ball knowing your starter probably won't make it past the 5th or 6th inning (especially with our bullpen).
I'm not anti-Maddux or anything....he did get us a few wins down the stretch. He also blew up in a couple games including one in the playoffs. I hope Coletti weighs his significant limitations before trying to resign him next year (his ERA for the year was an average 4.20 while rarely lasting past 6 innings).
Posted by: Kegorator | October 12, 2006 at 11:40 AM
I understand, AK, I like youre sound judgement. Raffy is obviously more than a legitamate choice. I just think that Martin was more important, not by much, but I think without him Raffy doesn't get the chance to do what he did.
Posted by: bmurph | October 12, 2006 at 11:42 AM
Kegorator,
I think most of us realize that Maddux wasn't his old self, but he definitely had a strong effect on the team. He came in when we needed another starter and exuded a professionalism that affected many on the team, most notably Lowe. So while he wasn't his old self pitching he still gave our team a noticable lift.
Posted by: bmurph | October 12, 2006 at 12:06 PM
I'm going to suggest a Blog MVP. The award goes to the player who helped to unite all of the bloggers, had a nearly unanimous opinion expressed about him and was incredibly consistent.
The nominees:
1. Danys Baez
2. Brett Bombko
3. Julio "I Am A Shortstop" Lugie
4. Lance Carter
5. Jose Cruz, Jr.
6. Jae Seo
7. Ricky "Scary" Ledee
And the winner, currently on location in Kansas City and unable to accept his award is:
Odalis Perez.
Posted by: Dodgerdog | October 12, 2006 at 01:00 PM
Dodgerdog,
Way less controversial, but way funnier. I think everybody hates Odalis
Posted by: bmurph | October 12, 2006 at 01:31 PM
Honorable mentions to Tim Hamulack and Fransisco Osoria on the Blogger MVP. HAHA!
Posted by: LoLo | October 12, 2006 at 01:53 PM
AK -
I agree with your top five and honorable mentions, but I would change the order for me. My vote for MVP would have to go to Martin.
1. Martin
2. Furcal
3. Saito
4. Nomar
5. Lowe
Thanks for continuing to give us excuses to talk baseball and Dodgers!
Posted by: DodgerOtter | October 12, 2006 at 02:41 PM
Furcal gets my vote without question!
Having said that, the great thing about this team is that so many guys made a significant contribution. The dissapointment of being swept by the Mets has quickly been replaced by optimism, not just about next year but many years to come!
Posted by: SantaMonica4Ever | October 12, 2006 at 02:48 PM
My award goes to Penny> The MOST VOCAL PLAYER
--Who on the Dodger team could yell at the manager and his teammates better? Who could have more excuses for his pathetic outings? This should be the most obvious choice of all! BRAD PENNY - MVP
Posted by: Tom | October 12, 2006 at 03:58 PM
SM4Ever,
Like I said, I went back and forth with my 2-5 order before posting (and even after... haha). Catch me tomorrow and I might rank it differently. But I do think those were the top 5, no matter what.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | October 12, 2006 at 06:11 PM
I think AK's picks are right on the mark. As Furcal went, so went the LA offense and his great second half of the year was the impetus behind the team's surge to the playoffs. I know he's not in the list of the team's MVPs, but I think we need to give a special shout out to Olemdo Saenz. He is the proverbial professional hitter and the guy seems to go about his business with class and professionalism.
Posted by: Tim H | October 12, 2006 at 06:21 PM
I really wish I could spark some solid brother vs. brother controversy... but I actually think AK's rankings are pretty spot on. You can make an arguement that Martin should be above Nomar, just because he was so consistent throughout the year, but AK is certainly not doing anything outrageous. Nomar carried the team offensively through the first half (those games count, you know) and even when he wasn't hitting for average in the second half- it's hard to hit when all your body parts hurt- he still had some massive hits.
I think it comes down to Lowe vs. Furcal, and once April was over and Furcal got going, I think he basically became the best player the Dodgers had, for longer than anyone else. Other guys had the title for a week here or there, but overall, Raffy held the mantle for the longest period of time (think of it like the "laps led" stat in auto racing).
BK
Posted by: Brian Kamenetzky | October 12, 2006 at 06:41 PM
Tim H,
No doubt. If I made my list of 5 favorite Dodgers, Saenz would make the list rather easily. I both enjoy and respect how he goes about his business quite a bit myself.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | October 12, 2006 at 06:48 PM
WAIT A MINUTE.
As good as Furcal was, I think everyone is forgetting the ONE guy who was steady for the WHOLE year(except for some injury time). Especially strong down the stretch.Big hits and clutch play. I can't believe no one even considered him for the also rans. Of course I am talking about the pro's pro Jeff Kent!!!
David
Posted by: David Stein | October 12, 2006 at 06:54 PM
As for Saenz, He is one of my favorite Dodgers. And even though he struck out looking in game three, I still would have rather seen him hit earlier in the game when the bases were loaded, but 'gut man' Little put up cripple Nomar.
More on my choice for Kent as MVP. Remember when Saenz got that tying hit in the ninth inning? It was Kent who told him what to expect. Again, I am stunned that he wasn't mentioned on ANYONES list.
David
Posted by: David | October 12, 2006 at 07:02 PM
Geez Dodgerdog,
It's hard to choose. Carter and Baez really disgusted me but Cruz and Lugo also made me just as sick. I vote for Little for continuing to play Lugo and bat him third. Also continuing to play Cruz and pinch hit Ledee. We really suffered through some incredibly sh**ty players this year.
Posted by: Jim | October 12, 2006 at 08:34 PM