On the Rise?
Peter Gammons breaks down the NL West in today's edition of his ESPN Insider Blog. Given that two seasons ago the division champ won 82 games (with the runner up notching an anemic 77), subjecting the lot to well deserved derision and ridicule, there really wasn't anywhere to go but up. Last year, the Dodgers and Padres won 88 games, while the Diamondbacks were playing well until hitting (splattering against, really) the wall late. Most important, every team won at least 76 games. Outside the AL West, no division had better "bad teams." And because two of those squads, Colorado and Arizona, skewed seriously young, and a third (our very own Blue) was youth injected, things bode well for this season. It's possible that four teams in the division could be over .500. I leave out the geriatric Giants, because they haven't done much to get better. Zito for Schmidt is a lateral move, and if Bonds doesn't come back big and bad, they're in major trouble.
Not surprising, Gammons points to pitching and youth as the major strengths of the division, and an explanation of its improvement.
"Two years ago, the Padres won the division with an 82-80 record, and the five teams were outscored by a combined 498 runs.
Now fast-forward to 2007. The Dodgers are coming off a year in which they had the best run differential in the league (+69), the Pads were third (+52) and led the league in earned run average, and the Rockies outscored their opponents by one run and ranked seventh in the league.
Next, bring Randy Johnson back to Arizona; move Jason Schmidt into the Los Angeles rotation with Derek Lowe and Brad Penny; put Barry Zito in San Francisco with Matt Cain, Noah Lowry and Jonathan Sanchez; and add Greg Maddux to the Padres' rotation.
OK, none of these moves is equivalent to bringing David Beckham to the Galaxy. But in a division that boasted half of the six best ERAs in the league (San Diego, L.A., Arizona) and where the Padres, Dodgers and Giants all have distinctly pitching-oriented parks, the shift has clearly been toward pitching. 'It's clearly becoming a pitching-oriented division,' says Dodger GM Ned Colletti.
Arizona's Josh Byrnes agrees: 'I think it's very clear that the teams in this division are building with pitching. Most of it is obvious, but don't underestimate Colorado, especially their bullpen. We have the most offense-friendly home park, but we're trying to build as much pitching as possible to go with our young divisional talent.' "
Granted, things always look rosier in January for some teams than they will in August, but when "Colorado" and "pitching" can be put in the same sentence without inducing peals of laughter, that's a sign of progress. Gammons goes on to talk about the Dodgers:
"Then one looks at the Dodgers and their pitching now that they signed Schmidt and Randy Wolf to go with Lowe, Penny and either Chad Billingsley or Hong-Chih Kuo. Grady Little's patience helped Takashi Saito turn into a 24-for-26 closer with 107 strikeouts in 79 innings at the age of 36, and if Saito -- who was the equivalent of a walk-on -- goes back to what he was in Japan, Jonathan Broxton is in the wings, Billingsley could become a reliever, Yhency Brazoban is coming back and there is Jonathan Meloan coming out of the lower minors after punching out 91 in 52 innings.
They will pitch, and while Colletti took some heat for the money he gave Juan Pierre, at the time the Dodgers had one outfielder. Now, they have Pierre and Rafael Furcal at the top of the order. They have James Loney and Nomar Garciaparra at first; Jeff Kent at second; Wilson Betemit, Andy LaRoche and Garciaparra at third; Russell Martin and Mike Lieberthal catching; and an outfield combination of Pierre, Luis Gonzalez, Andre Ethier, Matt Kemp, Garciaparra and Marlon Anderson. 'We have some flexibility, so we don't ask too much of our better young players,' says Colletti."
The Pads were decent last year, and have added to their pitching depth to what was already a good staff. Going into '06, I picked the Diamondbacks as a team to watch, and for a while they made me look smart. Then they stopped. I've written that adding Randy Johnson at this point in his career isn't the big deal move it would have been a few years ago, but it certainly won't hurt anything, and because Arizona is getting better, I'll go ahead and pick them again as the NL West team to make "the leap" in '07. I doubt I'd get much arguement from Gammons.
"The Diamondbacks are one of the most fascinating teams in the game and, by adding Johnson, Livan Hernandez and Doug Davis in with Brandon Webb, they have a veteran presence for their young pitchers and position players. There was consternation in the Valley when Gonzalez and Shawn Green were let go, but their outfield defense changed dramatically. With Chris Young in center, Carlos Quentin in right and the Eric Byrnes/Jeff Davanon combination in left, the balls stopped going up the gaps in September; Arizona's pitching had the lowest opposing OPS in that month in the majors. The D-Backs believe Young is going to be a great player. Stephen Drew and Orlando Hudson in the middle of the infield can be dynamic players. They have two extraordinary young catchers in Chris Snyder and Miguel Montero, and everyone expects Conor Jackson and Chad Tracy to hit at the infield corners.
If the bullpen holds together, the Diamondbacks can be pretty good, and their fans can have Johnson's countdown to 300 and revel in his place in baseball history."
They won't be good enough to beat the Dodgers, should the Blue hold together, but a Wild Card spot is certainly possible. Either way, among L.A., San Diego, Arizona, a "Hey, we don't suck anymore!" Colorado squad, and the Giants (they won't be good, but they'll be better than most bottom-dwelling groups), the days of treating the NL West like baseball's leper colony are over.
BK

Ever since Think Blue told Adrian Beltre to come back because Seattle is too cold, look at what has happened to our weather.
There's an omen for you.
Posted by: Dodgerdog | January 15, 2007 at 11:29 AM
Something to make you scratch your head...
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2732019
Posted by: Makoto Ueno | January 15, 2007 at 12:45 PM
mak:
just a question. Why would signing Hendrickson make ya scratch your head? They decided to keep him as he actually was not horrible in the pen. By agreeing to a deal the Dodgers reduced the chance they would lose in arbitration, so they likely saved money. Either way he is a lefty and therefore tradeable is need be...
Beyond fact he is no ace and almost not even a #5 so far, I think it's a decent way to fill the pen for now.
BK:
I thought last year was a sign of good things to come for the division. None of the teams was dominant over all of the others in the division. And like Gammons noted, they all got better and with the exception of 'frisco, are fairly young.
It's the cycle we see in most sports. As teams decline others rise only to see it cycle again down the road. I am unsure but it sure seemed as if there was a reeal change in the level of competition when, after expansion, the number of divisions was changed, teams changed into different divisions, wild cards added and a couple teams changed leagues. That was a ton of change in a pretty short period so, maybe they are all returning to some level of stability again.
BTW, Gammons is still alive? Who knew?
Posted by: grumpy3b | January 15, 2007 at 01:56 PM
BK wrote:
"...They won't be good enough to beat the Dodgers, should the Blue hold together,..."
BlueGlue? I think a case is needed just for Nomahhhh.... :D
Posted by: grumpy3b | January 15, 2007 at 02:00 PM
Grumpy,
I'm scratching my head over the $1 million dollar raise he will be getting next season. It seems pretty steep for a 15 game loser.
Posted by: Makoto Ueno | January 15, 2007 at 04:06 PM
Makoto is right. I am scratching my head at the fact that he got a million dollar raise and he sucked. Unfreaking believable!
Posted by: Jim | January 15, 2007 at 08:21 PM
Jim, this is professional baseball. You get a raise just for breathing.
BK
Posted by: Brian Kamenetzky | January 15, 2007 at 11:59 PM
I guess the biggest headscratcher about this Hendrickson thing is the fact that the Dodgers actually may have saved money at $3 million a year. If they had taken him to arbitration, who knows what kind of money he would have commanded.
Posted by: Makoto Ueno | January 16, 2007 at 08:35 AM
BK,
Not only do you get a raise just for breathing, but being a lefty is a huge bonus.
Unfortunately, that is based on the flawed reasoning that you can actually pitch with any effectiveness. It is truly a sad state of affairs when a really poor season still nets you a $1 million raise, with the probability that arbitration would have brought an even greater reward.
Posted by: Dodgerdog | January 16, 2007 at 10:23 AM
I'm still pissed at the raise in ticket prices, and losing HALF of the pavilion seats. I loved those the best because it's close to the field for $6!!
Posted by: Wasabi | January 16, 2007 at 06:51 PM
Mak:
I gottcha about the cost...like as someone here sed it is sorta the "Hendrickson Line" for pitching. Sad to realize that he could have gotten even MORE if it had gone to arbitration. I give Colletti credit for knowing what is he is doing so far. In his eyes Hendrickson must be a decnt team guy and have a solid attitude. He (Hendrickson) could have simply shut it down last season and pouted like Hall seemed to do at first. but the guy kept running out there and do the best he could.
I seem to remember reading he even went to some therapy for stress management. Who knows he might turn out to be a somewhat endering kinda guy for the team because of his attitude.
Posted by: grumpy3b | January 18, 2007 at 01:17 PM