| Main |

Report card: Position Players

Report_card Report card day. When judgment is handed down from on high and pampered members of the athletic elite tremble in anticipation of scathing, potentially reputation-destroying evaluations from their online overlords. 

Okay, maybe not.  But we'll still deliver them anyway.  Today, position players.  For much of the year, the Blue struggled with injury and inconsistency, unable to score runs or generate excitement.  A great deal of energy, much to my consternation, was still centered on the "kids vs. vets" debate, a storyline that distracted from the team's fundamental problems and tended to gloss over the problems both camps faced.  Overall, the Dodgers got a solid amount of production from the group of players likely to be part of the core over the next few years, but it wasn't all moonpies and bubble gum. 

When it's all said and done, the grades reflect what most of us saw from the team, especially pre-Manny: Great potential mixed with frequent eye rolling. 

A couple housekeeping notes:

Grades are given with the following in mind-

  • Players are graded based on production, and the expectations for that player heading into the season.  Meaning Blake DeWitt and Andruw Jones aren't starting in the same place.
  • C is average.  No gradeflation. 
  • Where I went to school, there was no A+.  Thus A is the highest grade. 
  • This isn't like grading a multiple choice test, more like an art project.  Lots of room for interpretation. 

That said, without further ado...

James Loney: There were games and weeks when Loney looked like the top-shelf hitter I believe he can be and others when he looked decidedly more ordinary.  Given this was his first full major league season, perhaps a dropoff from his partial-year numbers was to be expected and a wretched September didn't help things, but in the end it's hard to feel totally satisfied with Loney's body of work.  The .289 BA wasn't bad (though not the number I had in mind when I selected him in my fantasy draft), but the .338 OBP, 13 homers, and .772 OPS- lowest among first basemen listed here- were a disappointment.  His work in the field was similar to that at the plate- all over the place, often good, occasionally mystifying. 

2008 wasn't a wash by any stretch, but I think Loney has more in him, and the Dodgers probably feel the same way. 

Grade: B-

Blake DeWitt:  That he's even in a position to be graded is pretty incredible, since DeWitt was supposed to Dewitt_triple be in the minors all year. But pressed into service to start the season, DeWitt was very strong early in the year, particularly in May when he hit .322 with five homers and 18 RBIs.   He'd hit the wall in June and July, but was strong after returning to the bigs later in the year.  Four more homers and 15 RBIs in September.  While the average wasn't sterling, DeWitt had strong moments in the postseason as well. Add solid defense at two positions, and the Pride of Sikeston's rookie year was notable in a lot of ways.

And did I mention he wasn't supposed to be here?

Grade: A-


Rafael Furcal:
If Raffy's goal heading into his free-agent year was to prove his value to the team, he was highly successful, though the means of making his point was unfortunate.  After a torrid April, Furcal's back problems basically killed the rest of his regular season, and the Dodgers suffered at the plate and in the field.  With him, they were far more dynamic than without.  While his postseason was a mixed bag, that he was even able to rehab his way on to the field was fairly amazing.  There's no question how good Furcal can be when he plays... but over the last two seasons, "when" has been a problem.  How the Dodgers respond to his free agency is one of the winter's more intriguing questions.

Grade: A/Inc.

Jeff Kent: For much of the year, he was the most unproductive cleanup hitter in baseball, left in that slot out of a combination of misplaced loyalty and a lack of better options.  At this point in his career, Kent had become a complementary player, but the Dodgers were still in position to treat him like a focal point.  He had a great August, much of it hitting in front of Manny, not that it mattered (to him, at least). Kent's physical problems limited his defensive mobility and scuttled his September and postseason, a disappointing cap to a disappointing season but (assuming he retires) a brilliant career.  Unfortunately, we don't give grades for lifetime achievement.

Grade: C-/D+Nomar_hit

Nomar Garciaparra: He had stretches of productivity when in the lineup, but because Nomar was limited to 55 games and 163 at-bats, his impact on the season as a whole was minimized.  He just couldn't stay healthy, but should be praised for his selflessness, stepping up to play 31 games at short despite having to know it would put too much pressure on his body.  The good moments were fleeting (strong games in July, strong games in September), and fans would be wise to remember them, since it's unlikely the hometown hero will be wearing Blue next year. 

Grade: C

Casey Blake: Red hot when he arrived in LA, The Beard stabilized a black hole at third for the Dodgers, even while his production waned down the stretch. Overall, Blake's offensive numbers fell from their Cleveland levels, and while his power was nice, the average and OBP were a drag.  Like the rest of his teammates, Blake was in and out in the postseason, making outs, running into some bad luck, and picking up a big hit here and there.  He deserves credit, though, for being half the inspiration behind our first Photoshop contest. 

Grade: C+

Angel Berroa: He hit .230 with a .304 OBP in 226 ABs, but gave LA a steady glove at shortstop after injuries forced LA's hand. That a barely-rehabbed Furcal was a better option in the playoffs gives you an idea of Berroa's production, but overall it's hard to complain about what he brought, given the expectations.  Plus, he was a lot of fun in the locker room (the man loves remote control toys) and delivered the best postgame interview of the season. 

Grade: C

Andruw Jones: Unfit.  Unproductive.  Unhealthy.  You think you hate it now, but wait 'til you drive it!

Grade: F/inc.

Juan Pierre: For the first time in his career, Pierre was a part-time player, except when injury forced him into the every-day lineup.  Initially, he bristled at the arrangement, but eventually stopped talking about it and went about his business.  On the field, despite adjusting to a new role, Pierre was basically the same guy as last season, with a decent average and stolen bases, but a bad OBP and a noodle arm.  After the season he very respectfully asked for a trade, and if the Dodgers can make it happen it would be best for everyone involved.  He'll have some value for someone, but there isn't space for Pierre in LA. 

Grade: CAndre_ethier

Andre Ethier: He finally had the chance to become an everyday player, though perhaps not everyday enough for some, and Ethier certainly took advantage.  For five months his play ranged from solid to outstanding, the sixth being a sub-.200 June, the capper coming in September when Ethier hit a ridiculous .416 with 18 RBIs, .692 SLG, and a Manny-esque 1.249 OPS.  If you're a believer in VORP and other fun numbers, Ethier's 39.7 figure was second only to Manny's, confirming what most of us saw on the field.  Add in solid defense playing both left and right, and it's pretty clear that Ethier truly found his place in '08.

Grade: A-

Manny Ramirez:  Do I need to bother?  Look at his numbers in 53 as a Dodger, add in his monster postseason, and then argue why I need to keep typing. 

Grade: A

Matt Kemp: Like Loney, there's something still very "unrealized" about Kemp, though in a much more raw sense than his lefty teammate.  He still makes mistakes aplenty, both in the box and on the bases, and seemed capable of turning even the most routine outfield plays into hugely suspenseful affairs.  At the same time, Kemp was clearly a more mature player on and off the field.  In those moments where he seemed to "get it," Kemp was a reasonably patient and extremely dangerous hitter, and in the end, even if some wanted more, the numbers- .290/18/76, with 93 runs scored and 35 stolen bases- are pretty good and indicate the faith placed in him by the organization is well placed.  Whether he becomes a superstar or not, Kemp is already a pretty good player with room still to grow.   

Grade: B

Russell Martin: Joe Torre may have said it best when he expressed that the pressure of being Russell Martin may have hurt the Dodgers catcher this year.  Given the ownership he'sMartin_vs_mets taken for the team, Martin struggled to deal with failure, losing his rhythm at the plate and too often pressing to find it.  Martin's numbers were down almost across the board (he did raise his OBP from .374 to .385 on the strength of 33 more walks than in 2007), and he wasn't as strong behind the plate, either. Still, relative to other catchers across baseball, he still was a productive player, with the fifth highest VORP.  Next year will be a big one for Russell, and it'll be easier for him if the Blue could make sure he doesn't have to carry the leadership burden alone.

Grade: B-

Danny Ardoin: Brought on after the injury to Gary Bennett, he did what most backups do behind Martin- watch.  He only had 51 ABs in 24 games, but generally did a good job calling games and handling other defensive responsibilities. 

Grade: C

Mark Sweeney: On most teams, he'd have been gone long before the end of the season, but for want of a better option as a left-handed pinch-hitter/his legitimately positive presence in the clubhouse/a track record of success he stuck around despite the fact he was hitting .092 on July 27.  And that, of course, is the bottom line.  Sweeney was around to be an effective bat off the bench, and he wasn't for virtually the entire year.  In the second half, Sweeney was a little better with strong OBPs, but still wasn't very good. 

Grade: D-

Delwyn Young: Injuries and a glut of outfielders (I wonder how often the two were related) limited Young's ability to make an impact, and as the season went along he became a more marginal character in the Dodgers' 2008 narrative, a tough adjustment for a young player.  He did hit .292 as a pinch-hitter, but most of that success came early in the season.  If the Dodgers can figure out how to eliminate the surplus, Young should fit in as a fourth OF next year. If they can't, he could get squeezed.

Grade: C

Pablo Ozuna: His major contribution was a soaring, inspirational slide into third on August 3rd.  36 games played, 32 ABs.  That about sums things up. 

Grade: D/Inc.

Chin-lung Hu: Batted a buck-eighty-one in 116 ABs and didn't look altogether comfortable in the field before being sent back to the oven for more baking.  After fixing an eye problem in the minors, he hit the ball better.  The Dodgers hope he's got the stick to be an every day player in the majors.  Still lots of potential here.

Grade: D

Thanks for playing: Luis Maza, Andy LaRoche, REPKO!, Bennett, Terry Tiffee, AJ Ellis. 

BK

Comments
uclart47

It's your game so yu get to make the rules but I don't really think it's fair to penalize someone because you had high expectations of him nor to reward someone because he came out of nowhere. Since you are using the same letter grades for everyone, there is a natural tendency to compare, which doesn't really work under your system. For example, I don't think anyone thinks Blake DeWitt was the 3rd best player on the team. I think you were a little hard on some players but my only real complaint is Kemp and his strikeout record ahead of Loney.

Brian Kamenetzky

uclart47-

I get what you're saying, but at the same time, it doesn't feel appropriate to me to grade everyone by the same standard, either. Certain guys are supposed to perform at a certain level, and can be measured against the ones they set for themselves, oftentimes.

I think your comments about Loney have some merit, and I can see where you think the grade was a little harsh. A straight B certainly makes sense, too, but much above that, I don't see it. He wasn't bad (remember, I consider C average), but it wasn't an outstanding season for him, especially relative to other 1Bs.

In the end, think he's a far better hitter than he showed this year, which should encourage Dodger fans because it wasn't like Loney was a disaster.

BK

VA Blueblood

"If you're a believer in VORP and other fun numbers..."

Are you dudes believers? I think so, because you refer to OBP and OPS more than most sportswriters, but you also still measure BA without the caveat of BABIP that seems to put it in more perspective. I guess I'm just using this line as an opening to ask the kambrothers about their opinion of sabermetrics on the whole. Care to take the bait, fellas?

And I appreciate this write-up of the team; I think it opens some good hotstove lines of dialogue.

David s

What I like about the report card is Ethier. I always liked him. And remember his rookie year he was just about leading the league in hitting for the first half and I felt he was a lock for Rookie of the Year before he faltered and was replaced by Anderson. It was only after the season that we found out he was injured. A good year last year also. But if we were to look back at everyones 'dream trades' from the beginning of this year we see that it was Ethier that everyone wanted to let go. And rated him behind Kemp, Loney and Martin. I assume we won't be seeing those opinions again.
David

Brian Kamenetzky

VA-

I am, though I think it's easy to get bogged down in some of the new metrics because there are so many, and some are relatively complex- paralysis by analysis, so to speak. But generally, I think the new ways of measuring players are a great thing, and don't understand the resistance among more "traditional" writers. What I like best about some of the new metrics is they more accurately project what you see on the field on a day in, day out basis with teams you follow closely.

I also appreciate how the new stats help give more depth to more traditional numbers like BA, which are based a great deal on luck, or RBIs, based on a great many external factors beyond a player's control. BABIP, for example, is a great one for a player like Kemp, especially.

I try to cite some of those new stats when I can, though prefer to pull from the people who do better statistical analysis than I'm capable of (both because I struggle with math, and am a little too lazy to break it all down).

In the end, I don't see how the additional information provided by sabermetrics can possibly be a bad thing. Like all tools, it's possible to use them improperly, but what's wrong with having them in the box?

BK

Chunkdog

AK/BK,

For my money (I recently bought AIG and Lehman Brothers), you've nailed it when it comes to Loney. I, too, was disappointed in his performance and progress--expected much more.

Conversely, Kemp had much further to progress and did OK. If/when the strikeouts are reduced, he'll really blossom.

Looking forward, there certainly are lots of positions to fill. Assuming DeWitt back to 3rd-2nd, SS, OF are gigantasaurus issues. Nomar, Kent, Sweeney seem gone and Pierre and Fatso should be.

Of course, REPKO! could play them all.

I'm looking forward to your pitching analysis. I see that Jason Schmidt says his latest operation brought him "immediate relief". Sounds like the proverbial kiss of death.

VA Blueblood

BK,

A fair take. I guess I'm the same way, albeit that I have the passion of a convert; I feel like now that my eyes are open to the fallacies of such things like batting average, I tend to reject them with vigor.

The one the really makes my head spin is Equivalent Average (or EqA on sites like espn), which tries to measure OBP and SLG (while weighting them so that OBP is more important), accounts for the variance of BABIP, throws out the minus of sacrifice bunts AND throws back in the minus of sacrifice flies, detracts for K to BB ratio, and even tries to incorporate stolen bases. Then--and here's the quantum analysis Ph.D. part--it then scales the numbers down so that it looks like BA and provides what traditionalists think BA provides. How does it do all that? I have no frickin' clue, and thereby no way to test the validity of what these stats guys say these things measure. So I guess I take it on a certain level of faith, but I can say that my faith is strong--EqA appears to accurately rate players by comparison, and I find it to be a useful inclusion in player evaluation.

In any event, thanks for the insight to your perspective. Again, I like your writing more than most because you and AK include these types of things. Little by little, the rest of the baseball world will catch on.

Package

BK
Based on your guidelines for grading, I agree with the better part of your grades. I still do not know why each player is based on what is expected of him as opposed to what needs to come from a certain position. I do think you were a little easy on Kent who was not a good clubhouse guy but I don't know how this fits your grading guidelines. He certainly was closer to a D than a C. I think you also gave Sweeney a break and I attributed that to being a good clubhouse guy. Am I right? Other than that, except for Jones, I agree. Jones has to be lower than FFF!

Package

Brooklyn Dodger

David,

"But if we were to look back at everyones 'dream trades' from the beginning of this year we see that it was Ethier that everyone wanted to let go. And rated him behind Kemp, Loney and Martin. I assume we won't be seeing those opinions again."

Don't get me wrong, I do like Ethier. However, you are seeing that opinion again. Ethier is about a year older than Martin, about 2.5 years older than Kemp, and more than 2 years older than Loney. In my opinion, Martin, Kemp and Loney all have a greater upside than Ethier. Martin's numbers are to a certain degree depressed by the number of games he plays at the most physcially and mentally demanding position on the diamond. And in the case of Loney and Kemp, I don't think they've even touched the surface of their power potential. Power is generally the last thing to come to a hitter, and they're no different. I expect that the experience they gained this past year, along with the normal physical and mental maturation process, will play out in superior power numbers in 2009.

Again, don't get me wrong, I like Ethier, and think that he also has room to grow, but not as much as Loney, Kemp and Martin. For example, if the Dodgers were able to obtain Peavy at a reasonable cost, I would consider moving Ethier in such a deal, but not the other three.

68elcamino427

Dream Time for the Dodgers began with the second game in Arizona when Kent went out of the line up.

Manny was the catalyst. Without Manny - No Playoffs!

From this point of the season on it was like magic time.
Manny 's production on offense was unreal. We'll not see anything like it again.

benzojones

F!!!! You gave AJ an F!!! Playoffs!!! Who said anything about the Playoffs!!!

Dude shoulda got a G-.

Brian Kamenetzky

VA-

Funny you should talk about trying to wrap your head around formulas like EqA- I commend you for even trying! But however they do it, it turns out to be a pretty handy stat, you know? That's why I like VORP, too. It's been shown by people smarter than me to be a solid metric, and is incredibly handy for making cross comparisons. Take Martin, for example. I do believe he's been a disappointment relative to himself and what he's shown he's capable of doing, but a quick check of shows, relative to other Cs at least, he was still a productive player.

Making comparisons across teams can be tough, and while I understand the complaints of some who say that too many numbers can distort in the ways that too few (or relying on completely imperfect ones like BA and RBI) will, I just don't understand why anyone wouldn't look at all the new information as a positive thing. How can more information be bad?

Package-

I gave Sweeney higher than a failing grade in recognition of a second half in which he improved to the point of being slightly productive. Not necessarily good, per se, but not atrocious. As for the criteria, I understand what you're saying, but I think it's important to evaluate players with at least a healthy eye towards his potential. Sometimes players suffer, other times (like with DeWitt) they benefit.

It seems fair to me, but relative to position certainly is sensible, too.

BK

DBrim

DY is going to have surgery tomorrow. Suddenly I feel a lot better about the playoff roster.

Could a healthy Tony Abreu solve our 2B issues? I think we need to keep DeJesus in the minors for another year.

I think Hu needs a second chance, he didn't get much of one after he had the vision problem fixed. His last few ABs of the season were pretty solid, I thought.

I agree with the grades for the most part. Jeff Kent should get an F just because he went after Scully. Class act, right there. A lot of the other guys were hard to grade, too. Kemp is frustrating to watch and he's either scary good or scary bad. Either isn't very good offensively when there's not somebody good protecting him.

K T

BD,
I for one was against any trade of Either and still am...I think Kemp's "potential" will never be realized...If all the pieces fall together Kemp could be outstanding but what's the probability of that happening...He's good don't get me wrong...but I doubt he will ever reach his full potential

dcerros

Mark Sweeney a D-?

What exactly did he do besides striking out and stealing money? Forget an F, this dude deserves a Z.

FinalXaminer

1B loney gets a "C" (ok offense, put below avg HR total, but defensively a flop, having as many errors as HRs)........catcher martin also gets "C" 9for same reasons as loney).......kemp gets "B" overall fine yr, though still too many bone-headed baserunning miscues..........Ethier gets B+ as exceeded all expectations, even when battling senile old coot (torre) for playing time.........manny gets solid "A"........raffy gets an "I" (incomplete)........fatso jones/kent both get "F" (and lets hope both get the "F" out of town!).....
dewitt gets "c" overall exceeded expectations......3B casey Blake gets "B" as he helped immensey.....berrora gets "C"......pierre deserves "C".........pinch"hitter" (NOT!) sweeney gets "F" (see fatso/kent above!).......and clown who started season as backup catcher (bennett?) gets "F" too......"no-more" deserves "C"..........pitcher penny gets "F"........
and torre deserves "C"........hmmmmmmmm

Jack in DC

If Berroa had 4 errors in the NLCS would you still give him an "C"? I know you guys love Furcal but you can't give a guy an "A" for setting a record for errors in the most improtant series in 20 years - even if he is comming off rehab.

neoncactus

I agree on Loney, I spent half the season wondering if he's really going to get better or if he's just the second coming of Greg Brock.

benzo jones

hehe... he said Greg Brock... hehe... FIRE!

Rob

People you can't get LOWER THAN an F!! Package, Benzo, and dcerros.... I don't know where you guys went to school but I'm pretty sure F is the lowest grade they give out???... well maybe in Package and Benzo's case (ancient times) they gave Roman Greek Grades... and there was a thing called a FFF or G- or Z grade?

Jack in DC,
You can't give a guy a lower grade due to one game, even if it's the last most important grade... you're grading on "THE SEASON", not ONE GAME! Let me analogize to school... you're an A student all year.. get A's in every assignment, homework, and test. You come and take the final and you stressed, didn't sleep all night and mind went blank... you get an F... should you now get an F?.. granted it might be lower if the idiot instructor weights the annual work as 50% and Final as 50% but in baseball the one game is not equivalent to a final.

BK,
Agree w/ most grades. Don't like the Sweeney reasoning though. If you state he would of been cut from any other team for being the worst pinch hitter in history, then he should get an F for he would not even be on a roster to begin with to be given a grade.

Benzo Jones

Rob - my Greek Grade was a Phi minus, socrates was a prick.

lizzieinsb

Everybody just loves report card day. Not.

But this looks really fair BK.

Those with F, are assumed to be dropped from the class, I hope?? AJ, et al.

No points seemed to be scored for working & playing well with others, or not:
Along that line, I'd add half a grade to Martin, dealing with the parade of pitchers & their various issues, moving him up to a B.
Raffy would also gain half a grade on citizenship, but I'd have to take half a grade for dropsies in the playoffs, so that's a break-even.
What to do with Manny, who already has an A. How about A with Honors for lightening the mood around the place.
Berroa, no change, since he already got points for his toy cars & the interview. (Si hablas espanol, it's even funnier..)

Last, just because young Blake DW skipped a grade doesn't grant him different scoring--inconsistent offense, almost none in the playoffs, but dependable defense. So, Good, which would be, B.

Thank you teacher..

SaMo

Can't find anything to disagree with in your grades. I look for Ethier to become one of the premier players in the NL next season, a la Matt Holliday. I've liked him from day one, and he continues ot improve as he gets more playing time.

Loney is no Greg Brock. More of a Mike Marshall. But as long as he's no Hee Seop Choi, I'll take him. He has long reminded me of a left-handed Derrek Lee, which isn't too bad a comparison to aspire to.

Package

Hey Rob
I am pretty old, but not so old that I cannot recognize terrible. And A Jones is! I don't think we should pay the man his money! I have never seen you but I feel you could hit is well as him and probably better.HaHa.

Package

poppinfresh

Any truth to the rumor that McCourt is trying to sue AJ for last year's contract? He made $240,000 a game this year. If we count that by contributions... he has 14 RBIs, and that would be $777,777 per RBI. My opinion is this was the worst FA signing in the history of baseball. Boras and AJ should be sued for false advertising and lack of giving a damn. And Coletti still should be fired for falling for it. Seriously that is highway robbery for what little he did... like government contractors charging $1000 for a toilet seat.

I have always hated Scot Boras and all of his clientèle. They are the most over-hyped and under performing players in MLB unless it is a contract year. With the exception of Stray-Rod and now Manny and Tiexeira, Boras has had the biggest over-rated and under-performing players of any agent in the world. Hello Kevin Millwood, Barry Zito, Eric Gagne, Jeff Weaver, Darren Dreifort, Kevin Brown just to name a few. Why anybody would sign one of his players is beyond me. You pay more and get less.

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





ADVERTISEMENT


Our Blogger
Andrew and Brian Kamenetzky
Andrew (right) and Brian Kamenetzky are hosts of the LA Times Lakers Blog, and contributing writers to ESPN The Magazine and ESPN.com. Additionally, they co-authored Fishing on the Edge, the autobiography of Mike Iaconelli, the bad boy of bass fishing and 2003 Bassmaster Classic champion. They grew up in St. Louis as Cardinals fans, but it doesn't impair their ability to Think Blue. After all, the Cards and Dodgers aren't even in the same division.

Email: kambrothers@yahoo.com

All LA Times Blogs

All The Rage
All Things Trojan
Babylon & Beyond
Bit Player
Blue Notes - Dodgers
Booster Shots
Bottleneck
Comments Blog
Countdown to Crawford
Daily Dish
Daily Travel & Deals
Dish Rag
Funny Pages 2.0
Gold Derby
Greenspace
Hero Complex
Homeroom
Homicide Report
Jacket Copy
L.A. Land
L.A. Now
L.A. Unleashed
La Plaza
Lakers
Money & Co.
Movable Buffet
Olympics: Ticket to Beijing
Opinion L.A.
Outposts
Readers' Representative Journal
Show Tracker
Soundboard
Technology
The Big Picture
The Daily Mirror
Top of the Ticket
Up to Speed
Varsity Times Insider
Web Scout
What's Bruin
Your Scene Blog
RSS Subscribe to this Blog | What is RSS?
ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT